Agent Sandboxesagentsandboxes.org
Alternatives

Firecracker alternatives

Answer in brief

The 6 alternatives below are grouped by kind of sandbox, and each says what it does differently from Firecracker. Start from whatever made you look: missing GPUs, session limits, self-hosting, pricing or isolation.

By the Agent Sandboxes editors · Updated

Why teams look beyond Firecracker

The reference microVM primitive for sandbox platforms; choose it when you are building a platform rather than consuming one.

  • Requires KVM and hardware virtualisation on the host, so it does not run on macOS or inside most cloud VMs without nested virtualisation
  • No GPU passthrough or graphics device
  • A VMM only: you must provide guest kernels, root filesystems, networking and a control plane yourself
  • Snapshots must be restored on an identical hardware and software configuration, and network connections are not guaranteed to survive a resume

Firecracker alternatives, by kind

Hosted sandbox platforms

SDK-driven sandboxes you create, run code in and destroy through an API.

  • E2B

    Open-source cloud sandboxes for AI agents, each a Firecracker microVM, with pause/resume, snapshots and forking.

    • Firecracker microVM
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable
    • BYOC
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: Code interpreters and short-to-medium-lived agent tasks that need microVM isolation, with an open-source self-host path. The safe default for most agent builders: mature, open source, microVM-isolated and widely supported.

Compute platforms with sandboxes

General serverless or app platforms that also offer sandboxes, often with GPUs.

  • Fly Machines

    Fly.io's low-level API for Firecracker VMs that start and stop in under a second and can be suspended to disk; the primitive underneath Fly.io's Sprites product.

    • Firecracker microVM
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: Teams that want raw, per-second-billed Firecracker VMs they orchestrate themselves rather than a sandbox SDK. A fast, well-priced Firecracker VM primitive for teams that want to assemble their own sandbox layer; for an agent-ready product on the same infrastructure look at Fly.io Sprites.

Cloud provider code execution

Managed code-execution tools from AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and OpenAI.

  • AWS Lambda MicroVMs

    A Lambda resource type that runs a full Amazon Linux 2023 environment in a Firecracker microVM, restored from a pre-built snapshot, with suspend/resume and an HTTPS endpoint per VM.

    • Firecracker microVM
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: AWS-native agent sandboxes and interactive sessions that need VM isolation, an inbound endpoint and cheap idle time via suspend. The AWS-native way to get Firecracker-isolated, suspendable sandboxes with a per-VM endpoint, within an 8-hour lifetime and without a higher-level sandbox SDK.

Isolation primitives and runtimes

The hypervisors, user-space kernels, OS sandboxes and WebAssembly runtimes that sandbox platforms build on.

  • gVisor

    Google's user-space application kernel for containers, with the runsc OCI runtime, GPU passthrough via nvproxy and checkpoint/restore; used by Modal, Beam, Anthropic, OpenAI and Google Cloud.

    • User-space kernel
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable
    • GPU
    • Snapshots

    How it differs: Sandboxing containers on hosts where you cannot or do not want to run a VM per workload, including GPU workloads. The most widely adopted non-VM sandbox boundary; choose it when a VM per workload is impractical or you need sandboxed GPUs.

  • Kata Containers

    An OCI runtime that runs each Kubernetes pod in a lightweight VM with its own kernel, on QEMU, Cloud Hypervisor, Firecracker, Dragonball or StratoVirt.

    • VM per pod
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable
    • GPU

    How it differs: Kubernetes clusters that need VM isolation per pod without leaving the container toolchain. The standard way to put a VM boundary around Kubernetes pods; choose it when your sandboxes are already pods.

  • libkrun

    A dynamic library that lets any program launch a microVM in-process, on KVM in Linux or Hypervisor.framework on macOS; used by crun/Podman, krunkit and microsandbox.

    • In-process microVM
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable
    • GPU

    How it differs: Embedding a microVM in your own tool on Linux or Apple Silicon without shipping a separate VMM. The microVM library to reach for when you want VM isolation inside your own tool, especially on macOS.

Firecracker vs alternatives

SandboxIsolationOpen sourceSelf-host / BYOCCold start (vendor)Max sessionSnapshots / pauseGPUSDKs
FirecrackerKVM microVMYesYes / No<125 ms (spec)Not documentedYes / YesNoREST API, CLI
AWS Lambda MicroVMsFirecracker microVMNoNo / Nosub-second to seconds (claimed)8 hYes / YesNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, PHP, CLI, REST API
E2BFirecracker microVMYesYes / YesNot documented1 h / 24 h (Pro)Yes / YesNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript
Fly MachinesFirecracker microVMNoNo / No<1 s start (claimed)Not documentedYes / YesNot documentedGo, CLI, REST API
gVisorUser-space kernelYesYes / Noms (claim)Not documentedYes / Not documentedYesCLI
Kata ContainersVM per podYesYes / NoNot documentedNot documentedNot documented / Not documentedYesCLI
libkrunIn-process microVMYesYes / NoNot documentedNot documentedNot documented / Not documentedYesRust, C

Frequently asked questions

What are the main alternatives to Firecracker?
AWS Lambda MicroVMs, E2B, Fly Machines, gVisor, Kata Containers, libkrun. Which one fits depends on what you need that Firecracker does not offer; each entry above explains how it differs.
Is there an open-source alternative to Firecracker?

Cite this page

Agent Sandboxes. (2026). Firecracker alternatives. agentsandboxes.org. Last reviewed November 9, 2026. https://agentsandboxes.org/alternatives/firecracker/

Found an error or a missing sandbox? Submit a correction — every entry links to the sources it relies on.