Agent Sandboxesagentsandboxes.org
Alternatives

Kernel alternatives

Answer in brief

The 6 alternatives below are grouped by kind of sandbox, and each says what it does differently from Kernel. Start from whatever made you look: missing GPUs, session limits, self-hosting, pricing or isolation.

By the Agent Sandboxes editors · Updated

Why teams look beyond Kernel

Hypervisor-isolated browsers with standby billing and open images, the most transparent isolation story among the closed clouds.

  • Hypervisor is not named and the self-hosted unikernel path targets Unikraft Cloud rather than a local setup
  • Region selection, GPU and BYO proxies require the $200/month Start-Up plan
  • The documented cold-start figures vary between pages (under 20 ms, ~30 ms p50, 794 ms benchmark)
  • ISO 27001 and GDPR are still in progress

Kernel alternatives, by kind

Compute platforms with sandboxes

General serverless or app platforms that also offer sandboxes, often with GPUs.

  • Unikraft Cloud

    Millisecond-start microVMs built from Dockerfiles on a modified Firecracker VMM, with stateful scale-to-zero, live forking ("branching") and checkpoints, plus a Sandbox SDK for agents.

    • microVM (modified Firecracker)
    • Self-hostable
    • BYOC
    • GPU
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: Agent fleets that need thousands of sandboxes per server, millisecond stateful wake-ups and live forking of running environments. A density- and latency-focused microVM platform whose stateful forking and shielded egress suit large agent fleets, if you can work with unpublished pricing.

Browser and desktop sandboxes

Hosted browsers and full desktops that computer-use agents click, type and browse in.

  • Anchor Browser

    Cloud browsers for agents with a dedicated VM per browser, managed authentication identities, persistent volumes and a Web-Bot-Auth-verified Chromium fork.

    • Dedicated VM per browser
    • BYOC

    How it differs: Authenticated enterprise workflows that need VM-level isolation per browser and managed logins. The strongest isolation story in this group, a dedicated VM per browser, paired with managed authentication for enterprise agents.

  • Browser Use Cloud

    Stealth cloud Chromium at $0.02 per browser hour from the makers of the MIT-licensed Browser Use agent library, with profiles, live view, an EU deployment and a hosted agent API.

    • Isolated browser per run

    How it differs: Cheap stealth browser hours for agents built on the Browser Use library or any CDP client. Inexpensive stealth browsers with audited compliance and an EU option, best suited to teams already on the Browser Use library.

  • Browserbase

    Hosted headless Chromium sessions for web agents, driven over CDP with Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium or the Stagehand SDK, with Contexts for persisted logins and four regions.

    • Isolated Chromium session

    How it differs: Web agents that need managed Chromium at scale with persisted logins and stealth. A mature managed-Chromium service for web agents, with strong SDK and framework coverage but an undocumented isolation boundary.

  • Hyperbrowser

    Credit-billed cloud Chrome sessions with profiles, stealth and captcha solving, plus one-shot agent runs (Claude Computer Use, OpenAI CUA, Browser Use) and separate VM-based code sandboxes.

    • Isolated browser instance

    How it differs: Agents that need cheap browser hours with a built-in path to run computer-use models as one-shot tasks. A credit-priced browser cloud with the broadest built-in agent-model support, held back by thin isolation and compliance documentation.

  • Steel

    Open-source browser API for agents (Apache-2.0, self-hostable with Docker) with a managed Steel Cloud adding stealth, captcha solving, profiles and a hosted MCP server.

    • Isolated Chromium session
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable

    How it differs: Teams that want an open-source browser API they can run themselves or scale on a managed cloud. The open-source choice among hosted browser APIs: self-host for free, move to Steel Cloud for stealth, captchas and concurrency.

Kernel vs alternatives

SandboxIsolationOpen sourceSelf-host / BYOCCold start (vendor)Max sessionSnapshots / pauseGPUSDKs
KernelUnikernel VM per browserYesYes / No~30 ms p50 (claim)Up to 72 hYes / YesYesJavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Go, CLI, REST API, MCP server
Anchor BrowserDedicated VM per browserNoNo / YesNot documented3 h default, configurableNo / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, REST API, MCP server
Browser Use CloudIsolated browser per runNoNo / NoNot documented1 h default, 4 h maxNo / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, REST API
BrowserbaseIsolated Chromium sessionNoNo / No<2 s (claim)6 h (15 min Free)No / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, REST API, MCP server
HyperbrowserIsolated browser instanceNoNo / No<500 ms (claim)Up to 12 hNo / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, CLI, REST API, MCP server
SteelIsolated Chromium sessionYesYes / NoNot documented15 min / 1 h / 24 hNo / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Rust, CLI, REST API, MCP server
Unikraft CloudmicroVM (modified Firecracker)NoYes / Yes<10 ms (claimed)Not documentedYes / YesYesJavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Go, CLI, REST API

Frequently asked questions

What are the main alternatives to Kernel?
Anchor Browser, Browser Use Cloud, Browserbase, Hyperbrowser, Steel, Unikraft Cloud. Which one fits depends on what you need that Kernel does not offer; each entry above explains how it differs.
Is there an open-source alternative to Kernel?
Yes: Steel.

Cite this page

Agent Sandboxes. (2026). Kernel alternatives. agentsandboxes.org. Last reviewed November 9, 2026. https://agentsandboxes.org/alternatives/kernel/

Found an error or a missing sandbox? Submit a correction — every entry links to the sources it relies on.