OpenShell alternatives
The 6 alternatives below are grouped by kind of sandbox, and each says what it does differently from OpenShell. Start from whatever made you look: missing GPUs, session limits, self-hosting, pricing or isolation.
Why teams look beyond OpenShell
The right choice when the question is "what can this agent reach" rather than "how fast can I boot a VM".
- Default runtime is a container; VM-level isolation depends on the VM or microVM backend
- No snapshots, pause/resume or persistence features; sandboxes are recreated to change filesystem or process policy
- Windows support is experimental via WSL 2
- Primarily a policy and runtime layer for agents, not a sandbox API for arbitrary code execution from your application
OpenShell alternatives, by kind
Open-source runtimes to self-host
Open-source sandbox runtimes you run on your own servers or Kubernetes.
OpenSandbox
Apache-2.0 sandbox runtime for agents that starts on Docker, scales on Kubernetes and offers a Firecracker "Fast Sandbox" with pause/resume.
- Containers or Firecracker
- Open source
- Self-hostable
- Pause/resume
How it differs: Teams that want an open, multi-language sandbox API they can run from a laptop Docker daemon up to a Kubernetes cluster. The most broadly supported open sandbox API of this batch, with real microVM isolation available once you are on Kubernetes.
Isolation primitives and runtimes
The hypervisors, user-space kernels, OS sandboxes and WebAssembly runtimes that sandbox platforms build on.
bubblewrap
The unprivileged Linux namespace sandboxer behind Flatpak and Anthropic's sandbox runtime; you assemble the policy from command-line flags.
- Linux namespaces
- Open source
- Self-hostable
How it differs: Lightweight process sandboxing on Linux where you control the policy and do not need a kernel boundary. The right primitive for a laptop or CI sandbox on Linux when you can write the policy yourself; not a substitute for a VM.
Local sandboxes for coding agents
Isolation for agents like Claude Code, Codex or Gemini CLI on your own laptop.
Anthropic Sandbox Runtime
Open-source CLI and library (`srt`) that restricts filesystem and network access for any local process at the OS level, without a container or VM.
- OS-level (Seatbelt / bubblewrap)
- Open source
- Self-hostable
How it differs: Lightweight local sandboxing of coding agents and CLI tools. Excellent lightweight guardrail for local agents; pair with a VM for untrusted multi-tenant code.
Docker Sandboxes
Docker’s `sbx` CLI for running AI coding agents in microVM sandboxes on your machine, with an experimental Docker-hosted cloud.
- MicroVM
- Self-hostable
- GPU
- Pause/resume
How it differs: Running coding agents unsupervised on a laptop with microVM isolation. The easiest way to give local coding agents a real microVM boundary.
Gemini CLI sandboxing
Gemini CLI's built-in sandbox: macOS Seatbelt profiles or a Docker/Podman container around the agent's tool calls, with gVisor, LXC and a Windows option.
- Seatbelt or container
- Open source
How it differs: Confining Gemini CLI tool execution on a developer machine using built-in OS or container sandboxing. Adequate built-in confinement for Gemini CLI users; it is a feature of the CLI rather than a general sandbox.
nono
Kernel-enforced OS-native sandbox for coding agents that runs each tool call in its own ephemeral sandbox, brokers credentials and keeps a tamper-evident audit chain.
- Landlock / Seatbelt
- Open source
- Snapshots
How it differs: Running Claude Code, Codex and other coding agents on your own machine with kernel-enforced file and network allow-lists and brokered credentials. A strong choice for per-tool-call policy and credential brokering around local coding agents, provided OS-level isolation is enough for your threat model.
OpenShell vs alternatives
| Sandbox | Isolation | Open source | Self-host / BYOC | Cold start (vendor) | Max session | Snapshots / pause | GPU | SDKs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenShell | Landlock/seccomp in container or VM | Yes | Yes / No | Not documented | Not documented | No / No | Not documented | Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Rust, CLI |
| Anthropic Sandbox Runtime | OS-level (Seatbelt / bubblewrap) | Yes | Yes / Not documented | Process start | Not documented | No / No | Not documented | CLI (srt), TypeScript (npm) |
| bubblewrap | Linux namespaces | Yes | Yes / No | Not documented | Not documented | No / No | Not documented | CLI |
| Docker Sandboxes | MicroVM | No | Yes / No | Not documented | Until removed (local) | Yes / Yes | Yes | sbx CLI, TypeScript (cloud), REST API (cloud) |
| Gemini CLI sandboxing | Seatbelt or container | Yes | No / No | Not documented | Not documented | No / Not documented | Not documented | CLI |
| nono | Landlock / Seatbelt | Yes | No / No | Not documented | Not documented | Yes / Not documented | Not documented | CLI, Rust, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go |
| OpenSandbox | Containers or Firecracker | Yes | Yes / No | 64 ms P50 (claimed) | Not documented | Not documented / Yes | Not documented | Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, C#, CLI, MCP server, REST API |
Frequently asked questions
What are the main alternatives to OpenShell?
Is there an open-source alternative to OpenShell?
Cite this page
Agent Sandboxes. (2026). OpenShell alternatives. agentsandboxes.org. Last reviewed November 9, 2026. https://agentsandboxes.org/alternatives/nvidia-openshell/
Found an error or a missing sandbox? Submit a correction — every entry links to the sources it relies on.