Agent Sandboxesagentsandboxes.org
Alternatives

Browserless alternatives

Answer in brief

The 6 alternatives below are grouped by kind of sandbox, and each says what it does differently from Browserless. Start from whatever made you look: missing GPUs, session limits, self-hosting, pricing or isolation.

By the Agent Sandboxes editors · Updated

Why teams look beyond Browserless

A proven managed browser pool for automation code, less tailored to agents than its newer peers and silent on isolation.

  • Session isolation on the shared cloud is not documented
  • Sessions are short: 2 minutes on Free and 60 minutes at most on self-serve plans
  • SSPL licence restricts commercial self-hosting without a paid licence
  • No documented profile or login persistence feature

Browserless alternatives, by kind

Browser and desktop sandboxes

Hosted browsers and full desktops that computer-use agents click, type and browse in.

  • Browserbase

    Hosted headless Chromium sessions for web agents, driven over CDP with Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium or the Stagehand SDK, with Contexts for persisted logins and four regions.

    • Isolated Chromium session

    How it differs: Web agents that need managed Chromium at scale with persisted logins and stealth. A mature managed-Chromium service for web agents, with strong SDK and framework coverage but an undocumented isolation boundary.

  • Cloudflare Browser Run

    Headless Chrome on Cloudflare's network (formerly Browser Rendering), driven from a Workers binding, a REST API or a CDP endpoint, billed by browser hour on the Workers plan.

    • Not documented

    How it differs: Screenshots, scraping and short agent browsing from Workers without running a browser fleet. Convenient edge Chrome for Workers users and quick page tasks, not a long-lived or isolation-documented agent browser.

  • Hyperbrowser

    Credit-billed cloud Chrome sessions with profiles, stealth and captcha solving, plus one-shot agent runs (Claude Computer Use, OpenAI CUA, Browser Use) and separate VM-based code sandboxes.

    • Isolated browser instance

    How it differs: Agents that need cheap browser hours with a built-in path to run computer-use models as one-shot tasks. A credit-priced browser cloud with the broadest built-in agent-model support, held back by thin isolation and compliance documentation.

  • Kernel

    Browsers for agents where each Chromium runs in its own Unikraft unikernel VM, with standby that stops billing, profiles, and open-source images under Apache-2.0.

    • Unikernel VM per browser
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable
    • GPU
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: Agents that need fast, hypervisor-isolated browsers with pay-only-while-active billing. Hypervisor-isolated browsers with standby billing and open images, the most transparent isolation story among the closed clouds.

  • Lightpanda

    A headless browser written from scratch in Zig (AGPL-3.0) with no graphical rendering, offered as a CDP endpoint on Lightpanda Cloud with a free 10-hour tier.

    • Not documented
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable

    How it differs: High-volume page fetching and crawling where memory and speed matter more than pixel-accurate rendering. A fast, frugal engine for machine browsing rather than a visual sandbox; the cloud tier is young and lightly documented.

  • Steel

    Open-source browser API for agents (Apache-2.0, self-hostable with Docker) with a managed Steel Cloud adding stealth, captcha solving, profiles and a hosted MCP server.

    • Isolated Chromium session
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable

    How it differs: Teams that want an open-source browser API they can run themselves or scale on a managed cloud. The open-source choice among hosted browser APIs: self-host for free, move to Steel Cloud for stealth, captchas and concurrency.

Browserless vs alternatives

SandboxIsolationOpen sourceSelf-host / BYOCCold start (vendor)Max sessionSnapshots / pauseGPUSDKs
BrowserlessNot documentedYesYes / NoNot documented2 min to 60 min by planNo / NoYesJavaScript/TypeScript, Python, CLI, REST API, MCP server
BrowserbaseIsolated Chromium sessionNoNo / No<2 s (claim)6 h (15 min Free)No / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, REST API, MCP server
Cloudflare Browser RunNot documentedNoNo / NoWarm pool (claim)60 s idle, 20 min keep_aliveNo / NoNoJavaScript/TypeScript, REST API, MCP server
HyperbrowserIsolated browser instanceNoNo / No<500 ms (claim)Up to 12 hNo / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, CLI, REST API, MCP server
KernelUnikernel VM per browserYesYes / No~30 ms p50 (claim)Up to 72 hYes / YesYesJavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Go, CLI, REST API, MCP server
LightpandaNot documentedYesYes / NoNot documented15 min per connectionNo / NoNoCLI, REST API, MCP server
SteelIsolated Chromium sessionYesYes / NoNot documented15 min / 1 h / 24 hNo / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Rust, CLI, REST API, MCP server

Frequently asked questions

What are the main alternatives to Browserless?
Browserbase, Cloudflare Browser Run, Hyperbrowser, Kernel, Lightpanda, Steel. Which one fits depends on what you need that Browserless does not offer; each entry above explains how it differs.
Is there an open-source alternative to Browserless?

Cite this page

Agent Sandboxes. (2026). Browserless alternatives. agentsandboxes.org. Last reviewed November 9, 2026. https://agentsandboxes.org/alternatives/browserless/

Found an error or a missing sandbox? Submit a correction — every entry links to the sources it relies on.