Agent Sandboxesagentsandboxes.org
Alternatives

Scrapybara alternatives

Answer in brief

The 6 alternatives below are grouped by kind of sandbox, and each says what it does differently from Scrapybara. Start from whatever made you look: missing GPUs, session limits, self-hosting, pricing or isolation.

By the Agent Sandboxes editors · Updated

Why teams look beyond Scrapybara

A compact computer-use desktop API with good tooling, but undocumented isolation and pricing and a parent company that has pivoted make it one to evaluate carefully.

  • Isolation technology, pricing, regions and compliance are not documented
  • The company has publicly moved on to a new product (Capy); long-term support of the Scrapybara API is unclear
  • Stopping an instance deletes all data; no snapshot or image feature is documented

Scrapybara alternatives, by kind

Browser and desktop sandboxes

Hosted browsers and full desktops that computer-use agents click, type and browse in.

  • Browserbase

    Hosted headless Chromium sessions for web agents, driven over CDP with Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium or the Stagehand SDK, with Contexts for persisted logins and four regions.

    • Isolated Chromium session

    How it differs: Web agents that need managed Chromium at scale with persisted logins and stealth. A mature managed-Chromium service for web agents, with strong SDK and framework coverage but an undocumented isolation boundary.

  • Cua

    Open-source computer-use infrastructure: Linux sandboxes as gVisor containers and macOS or Windows sandboxes as VMs, run locally, in your own cloud account or as shared "Spaces".

    • gVisor container or VM
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: Teams that want open-source computer-use sandboxes on their own Macs, servers or cloud accounts, including macOS VMs on Apple silicon. The broadest open-source option for computer-use sandboxes across macOS, Linux and Windows, now firmly a self-run toolkit after the hosted cloud shut down.

  • Hyperbrowser

    Credit-billed cloud Chrome sessions with profiles, stealth and captcha solving, plus one-shot agent runs (Claude Computer Use, OpenAI CUA, Browser Use) and separate VM-based code sandboxes.

    • Isolated browser instance

    How it differs: Agents that need cheap browser hours with a built-in path to run computer-use models as one-shot tasks. A credit-priced browser cloud with the broadest built-in agent-model support, held back by thin isolation and compliance documentation.

  • Kasm Workspaces

    Container-streamed Linux desktops and browsers, self-hosted or as Kasm SaaS, with a Developer API and a free Community Edition that Kasm now also positions for agentic AI.

    • Docker container
    • Self-hostable
    • GPU

    How it differs: Organisations that already run browser-streamed desktops and want to give agents the same isolated, policy-controlled containers. A mature container-streaming VDI platform whose Developer API can hand agents isolated desktops, best suited to teams that already operate it.

  • Kernel

    Browsers for agents where each Chromium runs in its own Unikraft unikernel VM, with standby that stops billing, profiles, and open-source images under Apache-2.0.

    • Unikernel VM per browser
    • Open source
    • Self-hostable
    • GPU
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: Agents that need fast, hypervisor-isolated browsers with pay-only-while-active billing. Hypervisor-isolated browsers with standby billing and open images, the most transparent isolation story among the closed clouds.

  • Orgo

    Always-on cloud Linux and Windows desktops for AI agents, each an isolated VM billed by the second, with a computer-use API, MCP server, SSH, clone and fork.

    • Isolated VM (hypervisor not named)
    • GPU
    • Pause/resume

    How it differs: Agents that keep a persistent cloud desktop running around the clock with a browser, terminal and SSH. A persistent-desktop service for computer-use agents with unusually transparent per-second pricing, though isolation details are thin.

Scrapybara vs alternatives

SandboxIsolationOpen sourceSelf-host / BYOCCold start (vendor)Max sessionSnapshots / pauseGPUSDKs
ScrapybaraNot documentedNoNo / No<1 s (claimed)1 h default, configurableNo / YesNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, REST API, MCP server, CLI
BrowserbaseIsolated Chromium sessionNoNo / No<2 s (claim)6 h (15 min Free)No / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, REST API, MCP server
CuagVisor container or VMYesYes / NoNot documentedUntil destroyedYes / YesNot documentedPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, Rust, CLI, MCP server
HyperbrowserIsolated browser instanceNoNo / No<500 ms (claim)Up to 12 hNo / NoNoPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, CLI, REST API, MCP server
Kasm WorkspacesDocker containerNoYes / NoNot documentedAdmin-definedNo / Not documentedYesREST API
KernelUnikernel VM per browserYesYes / No~30 ms p50 (claim)Up to 72 hYes / YesYesJavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Go, CLI, REST API, MCP server
OrgoIsolated VM (hypervisor not named)NoNo / NoSeconds (claimed)Unlimited (paid)Yes / YesYesPython, JavaScript/TypeScript, REST API, CLI, MCP server

Frequently asked questions

What are the main alternatives to Scrapybara?
Browserbase, Cua, Hyperbrowser, Kasm Workspaces, Kernel, Orgo. Which one fits depends on what you need that Scrapybara does not offer; each entry above explains how it differs.
Is there an open-source alternative to Scrapybara?
Yes: Cua, Kernel.

Cite this page

Agent Sandboxes. (2026). Scrapybara alternatives. agentsandboxes.org. Last reviewed November 9, 2026. https://agentsandboxes.org/alternatives/scrapybara/

Found an error or a missing sandbox? Submit a correction — every entry links to the sources it relies on.